In a provocative suggestion, Carlos Monarrez of the Detroit Free Press has proposed a scenario that could send shockwaves through the NFL: a potential return of Matthew Stafford to the Detroit Lions through a complex double trade. While such an idea may capture the imagination of fans, the likelihood of it materializing remains quite low.
Stafford, who recently concluded a remarkable season with the Los Angeles Rams, is at the center of this speculation. At almost 38 years old, he led the NFL in passing yards and touchdowns, pushing the Rams close to another Super Bowl appearance. Despite his success, discussions about his future have emerged, especially since he has one year left on his contract that pays him $40 million in 2026. This figure seems misaligned with his current performance levels.
According to Monarrez, the hypothesis suggests that Stafford, seeking a contract extension or pay raise, might find the Rams hesitant due to salary cap constraints. Les Snead, the Rams” general manager, is known for his bold moves and might consider trading Stafford while his value is high. Meanwhile, the Lions are looking for ways to remain competitive in the playoffs.
The proposed trade would involve the Lions sending Jared Goff to a contender of his choice and reacquiring Stafford as they aim for a final championship push. However, there are significant obstacles to this scenario.
First and foremost, Goff is not the issue for the Lions. He is capable of leading a team to a Super Bowl, and the organization believes in his abilities. Monarrez argues that Stafford has the edge in crucial situations, particularly when protection falters. However, Goff”s no-trade clause, valid until 2028, complicates any potential deal. His consent would be essential, which would immediately reduce the Lions” negotiating power.
Another factor making this scenario seem unlikely is the approach of Brad Holmes, the Lions” general manager. Holmes has constructed the roster with a focus on draft discipline, cap flexibility, and selective aggression. He tends to be conservative regarding trades involving veteran players, contrasting with Snead”s more aggressive tactics.
While there is a connection between Stafford and Lions head coach Dan Campbell, who has praised Stafford”s leadership and toughness, this emotional connection does not override the practical concerns of salary cap implications and long-term roster stability.
Ultimately, the most plausible outcome for the Lions may be a less exciting one: Stafford likely receiving an extension from the Rams, allowing him to finish his career in Los Angeles while the Lions focus on rebuilding their offensive line and maintaining stability with Goff as their quarterback.
In summary, while the notion of a Stafford return to Detroit is intriguing, it remains firmly in the realm of speculation rather than a viable offseason strategy. Monarrez has certainly ignited a conversation with his bold idea, but the reality suggests a different path for both Stafford and the Lions.
